This variation on one of the most famous lines in English literature serves as a reminder of the dystopia present in the USA today. People have a choice about wearing a mask, and the choice they make has consequences for themselves and society. Most people who wear masks focus their energy on keeping themselves and their loved ones safe and protected from the coronavirus. Many wear masks and also wonder how to interact with friends, relatives and strangers who do not to wear them. Should they ignore and avoid them? Should they try to “persuade” them to follow the recommended health guidelines? It seems to us that somewhere in the middle of this spectrum exists the possibility of having a constructive conversation.
Psychological research has shown that many people choosing not to use protective masks and maintain physical distance do not respond favorably to the use of strong argumentative messages, financial or behavioral consequences, or shaming and other devaluing messages. These efforts to overpower a perceived resistance to wear masks are not only ineffective, but can backfire and have the opposite effects of contributing to stronger resistance, or what psychologists call “reactance” and “hardening of the person’s categories.”
The stakes are incredibly high, and stopping the spread of COVID-19 requires that we engage those choosing not to follow preventive measures. We need to understand their reasons for not adhering to these measures and to motivate them to see that wearing a mask and ensure physical distance are ways for all of us to get back to life as we knew it before this pandemic. A key question is, how can we accomplish this without entering into confrontational debates and being harshly dismissed? We believe that insights from research on motivational interviewing and public health can help us here. There is a need to understand people’s perception of risk and safety, both physical and psychological, and how these beliefs guide their behavior.
There is substantial literature about motivational interviewing to help individuals engage in health-promoting behaviors. Motivational Interviewing uses open-ended questions to help individuals express their thoughts about making decisions, especially when they are ambivalent and have mixed feelings. Such questioning helps individuals put into words their reasons “to wear or not to wear a mask.” Experts in this area highlight the need to:
How a conversation is initiated determines whether individuals will feel comfortable talking about an issue that is infused with so many negative emotions. Start by asking for permission to talk. Then ask follow-up, open-ended questions. The questions should be based on a curiosity about what the person sees as the best reasons to wear or not wear a mask. It is vitally important to understand the reasons offered for not wearing protective masks, keeping the physical distance and participating in preventive measures.
Understanding and respecting the reasons that individuals offer for their decisions, rather than trying to correct, argue with and challenge them, will open opportunities for engagement and connection to occur. Expressing empathy is critical to having individuals consider doing things differently. It is crucial to resist the temptation to forcefully persuade. Instead, one must listen with a goal of understanding.
You may start by saying something like this:
These questions can be followed up with the following type of questions:
As we see it, there are three main reasons for wearing a mask.
Reasons for choosing not to wear a mask and follow other recommended COVID-19 public health guidelines also fall into three categories. You should anticipate these reasons with a curious mindset and be ready to inquire about the perceived risk to themselves and to those whom they interact with.
Now let’s consider insights from the public health literature on adopting health-promoting behaviors with implications for how to facilitate the use of masks. Three things that work to encourage desired health behaviors are:
What would happen if experts and people with authority all gave the same clear and consistent message about wearing masks? Consider how this could help to change the social norm and expectations?
For instance, imagine university officials requiring students who do not wear a mask and who violate physical distance guidelines to read this statement, watch the video below and email two of their noncompliant friends the following message? In the email, students would be asked to include the reasons why they are now going to wear a mask and how they are going to try to convince others to do the same. The student would say: “This is my public commitment to help stop COVID-19 and my considerate, patriotic duty. It is the only way we can get life back to normal.”
When trying to encourage those who resist or oppose the use of masks to consider changing their ways, we should engage them in a conversation at a proper social distance and while wearing a mask, using the science and art of questioning and persuasion. Remember that the “name of the game” is to encourage others to offer self-generated reasons why wearing a mask is a safety issue and a “patriotic duty” to themselves and others. The only way they will get their life back to the way they want it to be is by wearing a mask and following social distancing guidelines.
Doing so works. In Taiwan they are now allowing fans into ballparks. Many countries are letting students back into school. Recently, Thailand, a country of 70 million people, went 100 days without a local coronavirus transmission and have experienced 58 deaths.
There is a clear discrepancy between the way those who choose not to use masks and social distance are now living and how they want to live. (“What are they missing in their lives right now?”) The goal is to engage and motivate as many people as possible to wear masks and keep the appropriate social distance so that we can all go on living how we want to live.
To watch the mask video, visit https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=930glgrxMsM
In summary, the decision “to wear or not to wear a mask” comes down to how you balance a 3 x 3 BOX of reasons:
TO WEAR | NOT TO WEAR |
---|---|
Risk to self | Question science |
Need to protect others (patriotic duty) | Perceived barriers |
Way to reclaim your lifestyle | Personal preferences |
HOW WILL YOU CHOOSE?
*Revised version of Meichenbaum D. & Aldarondo, E. (2020, August 1). How to Engage and Motivate People to Wear Masks and Social Distance. https://melissainstitute.org/how-to-engage-and-motivate-people-to-wear-masks-and-maintain-social-distance/. Thanks to all readers who took the time to share their thoughtful feedback on the original blog with us.
**Learn more about TMI at https://melissainstitute.org/.
He has served as Distinguished Visiting Professor at the School of Education at the University of Miami. He is one of the founders of cognitive behavior therapy. North American clinicians voted Dr. Meichenbaum “one of the 10 most influential psychotherapists of the 20th century.” He has presented in all 50 United States and internationally. He has published extensively and his most recent book is Roadmap to Resilience: A Guide for Military, Trauma Victims and Their Families. Other books include Treatment of Individuals with Anger-control Problems and Aggressive Behavior, Treating Adults with Posttraumatic Stress Disorder, Nurturing Independent Learners and Stress Inoculation Training.
He is a clinical psychologist with over 25 years of experience in domestic violence research and advocacy, mental health services, community partnerships, and higher education administration. His academic trajectory includes appointments in the Family Violence Research Program at the University of New Hampshire, Harvard Medical School’s Cambridge Hospital, The Philadelphia Child Guidance Clinic, Boston College, the University of Miami (UM), and Albizu University. The recipient of various recognitions for educational excellence and community involvement, Dr. Aldarondo’s scholarship focuses on positive development of ethnic minority and immigrant youth, domestic violence, and social justice-oriented clinical practices. His publications include the books Advancing Social Justice through Clinical Practice (Routledge), Programs for men who batter: Intervention and prevention strategies in a diverse society (Civic Research Institute with Fernando Mederos, Ed.D.), and Neurosciences, Health and Community Well-Being (San Luís, Nueva Editorial Universitaria with Dr. Enrique Saforcada and Mauro Muñoz). Dr. Aldarondo has a long history of involvement with grassroots advocacy organizations. He was Founding Executive Director of the National Latino Alliance for the Elimination of Domestic Violence as well as Founding Director of the Community and Educational Well-Being Research Center at UM. He is Past Executive Director of The Council on Contemporary Families and is on the board of directors for Casa de Esperanza and The National Resource Center on Domestic Violence.